Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '16 at 14:35
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 74 1-Core 80.9 2-Core 159 61% 105 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 499 48% 398 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185 33,175 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Sapphire(174B A003) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.300.2311.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Lighting 49.3 Reflection 35.6 Parallax 60.7 40% 48.5 fps	MRender 33.5 Gravity 45.8 Splatting 44.3 34% 41.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2907 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 247 (B1) Unknown 99 99 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 52 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 34 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8080507313	76.4% Very good	Read 490 Write 383 Mixed 398 94% 424 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 19.4 103% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 35.5 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 19.4 30% 53.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 124%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 32GB free Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3659836 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 135059541592879 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 677 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 35 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 42 90197065756 (C2) HDA temperature 28 42 90197065756 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3659836 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3659836 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3659836 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2705 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1987 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1987 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4803	59.6% Above average	Read 479 Write 195 Mixed 256 68% 310 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 60.4 4K Mixed 13.3 91% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 30.2 DQ Write 64.7 DQ Mixed 53.8 39% 49.6 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 87%
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000H1 128GB 1,750 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 3GB free Firmware: EMT22H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 796 (0B) Calibration retry count 99 99 23 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 119 (AA) Unknown 100 100 371 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 4 (AE) Unknown 99 99 23 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 1 (BE) vendor-specific 64 46 36 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0	46% Average	Read 266 Write 155 Mixed 174 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 15.8 80% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29 DQ Write 69.7 DQ Mixed 16 22% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 88%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 107GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 40GB free Firmware: 4.0 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Read 47.3 Write 38.4 Mixed 45.5 33% 43.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.43 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 6.18 1,084% 6.54 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 55%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59 9,994 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 24GB free Firmware: JF3OA0E0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 92 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 181 100 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 753 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 6181 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 750 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 1288490319872 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 49 387711004 (BF) G-sense error rate 92 92 2061 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1769499 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 71866 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	44.7% Average	Read 76.3 Write 79.5 Mixed 75.9 58% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.22 62% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 59%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30 34,154 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 12GB free Firmware: HPDA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 230046152 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 284 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4591877 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 3046 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 304 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1767947293 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 94 42950328332 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 57 538443808 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 62 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 295 (C2) HDA temperature 32 43 68719476768 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 188 162 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	39.9% Below average	Read 71.8 Write 67.4 Mixed 64.7 51% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.09 47% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB 6,948 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.4% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 9.1 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 8.4 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 92.4 43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	138x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16