Acer T

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Acer T (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer BA50-MV
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '16 at 19:07
Run Duration	291 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	90%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium T4200-$99 5,474 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Memory 60.4 1-Core 15.2 2-Core 12.5 25% 29.4 Pts	4-Core 20.3 8-Core 16.9 3% 18.6 Pts	64-Core 25.6 2% 25.6 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G105M 2,411 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0253) 512MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.18.13.2702 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 0.22 1% 0.83 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 1 1% 0.76 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95 9,561 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 58 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C2) HDA temperature 54 54 197570134062	26.2% Poor	Read 241 Write 105 Mixed 111 33% 152 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 12 4K Mixed 2.46 28% 8.93 MB/s	DQ Read 72.9 DQ Write 31.6 DQ Mixed 12.4 20% 39 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 83%
Generic- Multi-Card 8GB 195 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID 0159 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	6.74% Terrible	Read 18.8 Write 7.51 Mixed 10 14% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.85 4K Write 0.55 4K Mixed 0.29 39% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.74% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 2 10% 3.53 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 0.7 4% 1.27 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical T Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Acer T

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	2x
Phenom II N950AMDBench 41%, 264 samples	1x
Core2 Duo T6600IntelBench 35%, 8,673 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 240MNvidiaBench 2%, 2,359 samples	2x
Radeon HD 7400MAMDBench 2%, 4,688 samples	1x
Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 1%, 2,404 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V+ Series 128GBKingstonBench 34%, 720 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	2x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x
CM3X4GSD1066 2x4GBCorsairBench 27%, 616 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16