Asus N73JG

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus N73JG (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N73JG
Memory	0.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100903
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '16 at 11:07
Run Duration	488 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Memory 66.6 1-Core 70.7 2-Core 110 51% 82.6 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 178 22% 166 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 47%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1562) 2.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2361 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.66% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 0.69 1% 1.09 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.53 Splatting 1.35 1% 0.99 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.66% Great: 1%
Nvidia GeForce GT 415M 85 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1562) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3523 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.41% Terrible	Lighting 1.67 Reflection 1.96 Parallax 0.84 1% 1.49 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 1.63 Splatting 1.7 2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.41% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 20535 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1674 (B1) Unknown 1 1 2031 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 50 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 169 (F1) Unknown 99 99 283423256597	26.9% Poor	Read 235 Write 30.3 Mixed 47.1 22% 104 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 22.4 4K Mixed 6.97 43% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 35.1 DQ Mixed 20.6 29% 55.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 73%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 716GB free, PID ab24 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 27.2 Write 23.4 Mixed 24.7 32% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.32 70% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 55%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB 1,396 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 70GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 27.9 Write 22.9 Mixed 13.5 26% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.16 57% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 21%
LaCie Rikiki USB 3.0 1TB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 80GB free, PID 106a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 27.9 Write 23.5 Mixed 24.3 32% 25.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 0.84 4K Mixed 0.37 43% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 43%
LaCie Rugged FW USB3 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 18GB free, PID 104b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 23.7 Mixed 13.2 26% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.35 57% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 40%
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 11GB free, PID 5100 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.18% Terrible	Read 30.1 Write 6.82 Mixed 9.45 15% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.43 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.009 21% 1.82 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.18% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 859B BLS4G3N169ES4.16FE 6GB 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.6% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 9.2 23% 8.07 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N73JG Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N73JG

CPU
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	6x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	2x
Core i7 M 640IntelBench 43%, 5,045 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	9x
GeForce GT 415MNvidiaBench 1%, 85 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
SUV500240G 240GBKingstonBench 75%, 13,649 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273EH1-CF8 2x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 8 samples	4x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	3x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $184

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16