Asus P6T

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P6T (all builds)
Memory	21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100921
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '16 at 16:41
Run Duration	293 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 96.1 1-Core 71.2 2-Core 139 64% 102 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 359 39% 309 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% EVGA(3842 2673) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6451 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	28.7% Poor	Lighting 34.2 Reflection 34.6 Parallax 41.2 28% 36.6 fps	MRender 47.6 Gravity 30.6 Splatting 35.1 30% 37.8 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 291GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2075 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 123 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 60 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 96 96 3896 (EB) Unknown 99 99 17 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2262653166	84.2% Excellent	Read 377 Write 372 Mixed 376 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 32.3 120% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 116 114% 184 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 124%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 97GB free Firmware: SAFM00.r Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1184 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 144 (A8) Unknown 100 100 79 (AA) Unknown 100 100 758 (AD) Unknown 100 100 196619 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 720899 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 41 (C2) HDA temperature 69 60 171799674911 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 41 (DA) Unknown 100 100 41 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 781 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 726 (F2) Unknown 100 100 422 (F4) Unknown 100 100 3 (F5) Unknown 100 100 11 (F6) Unknown 100 100 209216	68.7% Good	Read 282 Write 366 Mixed 369 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 14 90% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 14.3 62% 140 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 111%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB 4,801 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0143 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 34.1 Write 32.9 Mixed 32.1 25% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.38 101% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 66%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 459 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 134GB free, PID 0475 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 29.3 Mixed 30.8 39% 30.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.38 58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 20%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB 3,370 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 74GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 33 Write 12.5 Mixed 14.3 22% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.28 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.73 64% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	58.6% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 22.1 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 15 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 53.5 75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	566x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	144x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	72x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	50x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	34x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	224x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	124x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	102x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $318

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16