User System

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	ECT A_M_I
Motherboard	MSI Z97 PC Mate(MS-7850)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20141107
Uptime	8.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '16 at 21:53
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 115 2-Core 222 82% 143 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 374 50% 373 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% MSI(1462 303A) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.200.1035.1001 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.3% Poor	Lighting 32 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 38.2 26% 33.2 fps	MRender 25.3 Gravity 26.4 Splatting 33.3 24% 28.3 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6033 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 872 (B1) Unknown 92 92 92 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 42 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 303 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16559131447	94.7% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 349 Mixed 338 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 24.4 138% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 67.1 114% 224 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 242GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 71 (03) Spinup time 194 194 12893487210 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3868 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6086 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 867 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 9018 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 9018 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 197569478691 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	75.9% Very good	Read 127 Write 138 Mixed 129 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.18 66% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 107%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 106GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 118 (03) Spinup time 139 135 4008 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9832 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29492 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3721 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 630 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9202 (C2) HDA temperature 112 85 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	73.7% Very good	Read 127 Write 130 Mixed 77.6 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.52 117% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1x8GB 7,988 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.1% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 8.7 26% 9.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.8 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16