Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateOct 11 '16 at 16:26
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 53.4
2-Core 106
52% 81.1 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 309
32% 259 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7306
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 64.5
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 62.9
53% 64.2 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 50.7
48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 482
Write 316
Mixed 337
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 20.3
97% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 67.5
DQ Mixed 57.8
60% 102 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 126%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 86.6
Write 83.6
Mixed 91.4
66% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.2
62% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 67%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
59GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 105
Write 13.7
Mixed 39.6
52% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.36
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 1.12
102% 2.89 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 32%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
11GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 123
Write 43.1
Mixed 50.4
77% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.67
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.92
97% 2.64 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.5% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.5
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback