PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61M-DG3/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120920 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Oct 16 '16 at 00:09 |
Run Duration | 94 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 53% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6510
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
43.6%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend JM1600KLN-4G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
54.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 21x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 18x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 21x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $114 |