Asus Crosshair III Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair III Formula (all builds)
Memory	29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111021
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '16 at 13:19
Run Duration	426 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T-$254 4,420 User benchmarks, average bench 56% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 53 2-Core 106 54% 83.3 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 318 33% 265 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 13C0) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7570 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	61.8% Good	Lighting 78.1 Reflection 82.8 Parallax 79.7 64% 80.2 fps	MRender 78.4 Gravity 71.4 Splatting 66.2 58% 72 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 140 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 126 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 39 (C2) HDA temperature 66 57 184684380194
Poor: 48% Great: 93%
Hitachi HTS723232A7A364 320GB 11,127 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 247GB free Firmware: EC2OA60W Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 64 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 100 73014444033 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2672 (05) Reallocated sector count 75 67 43385583 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 5186 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2524 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 42 9896314208314 (BC) Unknown 100 1 4591 (BE) vendor-specific 68 43 287637536 (BF) G-sense error rate 93 93 2020 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 19202341 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 87 87 139376 (C4) Reallocation count 79 79 678 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 72 99 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 97 97 811 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	54.1% Above average	Read 94.8 Write 93.8 Mixed 31.4 54% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.35 93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 58%
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25 4,646 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 11GB free Firmware: ZH100-47 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 4096 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6639 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5671 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3441 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 136 55 34 (C2) HDA temperature 136 55 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 452705 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	31.4% Below average	Read 53.7 Write 55.6 Mixed 41.5 38% 50.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.41 83% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 32%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB 194 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 11GB free, PID 800e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	3.56% Terrible	Read 15.6 Write 2.21 Mixed 4.49 7% 7.43 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.003 13% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.56% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 11.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair III Formula Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair III Formula

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	15x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	13x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	5x
HD 5850AMDBench 15%, 15,020 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
250GB 249GBSSDBench 56%, 4 samples	3x
ARC 100 480GBOCZ $70Bench 86%, 1,835 samples	3x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	11x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	9x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $453

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16