HP Z200 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z200 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B40h
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130909
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '16 at 08:16
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3440 6,034 User benchmarks, average bench 65% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 82 1-Core 66.5 2-Core 130 57% 92.7 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 286 32% 251 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI FirePro V5800 (FireGL V) 444 User benchmarks, average bench 9% HP(103C 2306) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	5.64% Terrible	Lighting 7.47 Reflection 5.54 Parallax 6.06 6% 6.36 fps	MRender 5.33 Gravity 5.23 Splatting 6.57 5% 5.71 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 5.64% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1096 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 77 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 49 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 50 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1665518475	39.9% Below average	Read 253 Write 140 Mixed 144 39% 179 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 27.2 4K Mixed 9.25 55% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 79.4 DQ Mixed 10.7 36% 82 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 394GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 153 138 3350 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 935 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11724 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 594 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 370 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 566 (C2) HDA temperature 111 91 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	66.8% Good	Read 116 Write 116 Mixed 115 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.46 117% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 69%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB 9,720 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 233GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 199 186 3025 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 442 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6431 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 311 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 129 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 312 (C2) HDA temperature 113 96 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	43.8% Average	Read 75 Write 77.8 Mixed 78.6 58% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.22 57% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 51%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB 9,720 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 48GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 189 185 3550 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 501 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7064 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 354 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 165 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 335 (C2) HDA temperature 113 94 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	27.1% Poor	Read 43.6 Write 50.8 Mixed 45.8 35% 46.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 0.25 57% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 98 9965525-085.A00LF ID:01 98 9965525-085.A00LF 44GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.3% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 11.9 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 9.3 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z200 Workstation Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z200 Workstation

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	58x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	37x
Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples	29x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	19x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	17x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT351U7CFR8C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:80 AD HMT351U7CFR8C-H9 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F 48GBUnknownBench 25%, 15 samples	7x
ID:00 00 ID:00 00 44GBUnknownBench 26%, 101 samples	6x
ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT ID:04 CD F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 52GBUnknownBench 30%, 14 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16