| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 40% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| System | Clevo M860TU (all builds) |
| Motherboard | CLEVO M860TU |
| Memory | 1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20081201 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 28 '16 at 02:27 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
| CPU Throttled | 40% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
38.6%
Below average
|
32% 43.8 Pts
|
10% 79.1 Pts
|
5% 86.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 9800M-GS
Clevo(1558 0860) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 275.33
|
3.95%
Terrible
|
4% 4.47 fps
|
4% 5.19 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
37.2%
Below average
|
38% 51.4 MB/s
|
82% 0.62 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
16% 5.5 GB/s
|
14% 4.73 GB/s
|
35% 116 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M860TU Builds (Compare 7 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Clevo M860TU
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples | 2x |
| Core2 Duo P9500IntelBench 39%, 301 samples | 2x |
| Core2 Duo T6400Intel $99Bench 34%, 4,995 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 9600M-GTNvidiaBench 2%, 3,959 samples | 3x |
| Quadro FX 2700MNvidiaBench 3%, 788 samples | 1x |
| GeForce GTX 260MNvidiaBench 5%, 1,120 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $122 |