EVGA 151-IB-E699

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	EVGA E699 0.0
Motherboard	EVGA 151-IB-E699 (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121004
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '16 at 07:36
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 96.7 2-Core 188 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 452 45% 365 Pts	64-Core 455 28% 455 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 570-$350 22,303 User benchmarks, average bench 20% EVGA(3842 1577) 1.2GB CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 372.70 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Lighting 22.8 Reflection 34.7 Parallax 25.5 19% 27.7 fps	MRender 34.8 Gravity 18.5 Splatting 23.3 20% 25.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 22%
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 372.70 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49% Average	Lighting 62.2 Reflection 61.1 Parallax 54.2 51% 59.2 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 57.5 Splatting 49.5 46% 56.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 21GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 2462612 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 -129287105523380 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 718 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 458 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2462612 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2462612 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2462612 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4025 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3383 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3383 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9224	42.3% Average	Read 199 Write 97.2 Mixed 119 30% 138 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 66.3 4K Mixed 13.1 80% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 30.1 46% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 61%
Samsung 830 64GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 15195 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2612 (B1) Unknown 86 86 508 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 60 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 455 (F1) Unknown 99 99 31306054691	52% Above average	Read 476 Write 107 Mixed 212 58% 265 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 41.8 4K Mixed 13.9 66% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 49.2 DQ Mixed 39.7 57% 113 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 63%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 110GB free Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 168 162 6575 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2306 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14189 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2260 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 560 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 101 101 299653 (C2) HDA temperature 124 109 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29% Poor	Read 43.5 Write 57.6 Mixed 54.8 39% 52 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.18 54% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	41.2% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12.8 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 151-IB-E699 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: EVGA 151-IB-E699

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	16x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	12x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	4x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x

SSD
SSD 512GBLexarBench 94%, 1,953 samples	5x
X120 PRO 256GBKodakBench 72%, 39 samples	3x
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TBBench 98%, 11,576 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	13x
Sniper DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 825 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $496

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16