Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70% Good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 75 2-Core 146 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 392 41% 330 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 71%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 247GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1126K Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 539 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 601 (A0) Unknown 100 100 3 (A1) Unknown 100 100 107 (A3) Unknown 100 100 12 (A4) Unknown 100 100 50438 (A5) Unknown 100 100 103 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 48 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 99 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 2 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 73 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 16494 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 6 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 524288 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 3 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 143330 (F2) Unknown 100 100 189888 (F5) Unknown 100 100 403504	84.2% Excellent	Read 466 Write 417 Mixed 433 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 60.7 4K Mixed 32.7 111% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 61.3 DQ Mixed 67 65% 106 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax FLGG45F-E8K3B 2x8GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 17.7 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 12.8 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16