| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5K SE/EPU (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080314 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 14 '16 at 17:54 |
| Run Duration | 86 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
45%
Average
|
38% 56.5 Pts
|
18% 136 Pts
|
9% 140 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 83BE) 1GB
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1036 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.19
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
10% 12.1 fps
|
12% 15.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
53.3%
Above average
|
53% 72.4 MB/s
|
107% 1.01 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.3%
Very poor
|
18% 6.13 GB/s
|
17% 5.83 GB/s
|
36% 110 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5K SE/EPU Builds (Compare 87 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5K SE/EPU
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 16x |
| Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples | 8x |
| Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
| GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples | 5x |
| GeForce GTX 285NvidiaBench 9%, 2,842 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $180 |