Hp-pavilion WC779AA-UUW HPE-140sc

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion WC779AA-UUW HPE-140sc (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100625
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '16 at 16:11
Run Duration	601 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 78.2 2-Core 148 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 322 36% 284 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Lighting 22.9 Reflection 17.7 Parallax 21.1 19% 20.6 fps	MRender 25.8 Gravity 24.2 Splatting 17.6 18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 240GB 5,061 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3172 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 603 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 238 (AD) Unknown 100 100 524306 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 114 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 92 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3806	45.6% Average	Read 261 Write 181 Mixed 163 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 36.9 4K Mixed 9.38 58% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 39.5 63% 123 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 94%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 731GB free Firmware: AX00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1656 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 9297 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 5597 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2411 (B7) Unknown 100 100 11 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 23 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 42 437452823 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 98 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 34363998281 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 59286 (C2) HDA temperature 77 42 437452823 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 17	58.7% Above average	Read 100 Write 104 Mixed 78 70% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.17 65% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 14,254 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	4.75% Terrible	Read 23.9 Write 1.86 Mixed 2.93 8% 9.56 MB/s	4K Read 3.49 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.01 14% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.75% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GB 5,347 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.6% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 11.4 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 10.2 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WC779AA-UUW HPE-140sc Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Hp-pavilion WC779AA-UUW HPE-140sc

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
HD 5850AMDBench 15%, 15,020 samples	1x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	1x

SSD
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $113Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	1x
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
HP497157-C01-ELDW 4x2GBUnknownBench 38%, 252 samples	1x
16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 4x2GBUnknownBench 39%, 385 samples	1x
HP497157-C01-ELDW AD80AD80 HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 9801 HP497157-C01-ELDW AD80AD80 HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GBUnknownBench 42%, 2 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $511

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16