Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '16 at 23:16
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	78%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 79.6 2-Core 129 64% 101 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 445 43% 355 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 13C0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.57 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	62.3% Good	Lighting 79.1 Reflection 84 Parallax 80.9 64% 81.3 fps	MRender 79.5 Gravity 71.5 Splatting 64.9 58% 72 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 544 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 520 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 198 198 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 274 (C2) HDA temperature 72 57 184684118044	45.2% Average	Read 356 Write 204 Mixed 161 53% 240 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 6.17 60% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 44 DQ Mixed 7.96 14% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 93%
Hitachi HTS723232A7A364 320GB 11,127 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 209GB free Firmware: EC2OA60W Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 64 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 100 73014444033 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 3214 (05) Reallocated sector count 75 67 49283914 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 5588 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2864 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 42 12048094789698 (BC) Unknown 100 1 5158 (BE) vendor-specific 73 43 454754331 (BF) G-sense error rate 93 93 2025 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 22151506 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 86 86 146308 (C4) Reallocation count 76 76 768 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 72 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 97 97 811 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	52.8% Above average	Read 91.2 Write 93 Mixed 30.5 52% 71.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.37 90% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 58%
Seagate STM3250318AS 250GB 3,989 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 81GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 185137834 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 82 82 19392 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 212024899 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7341 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9699 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 65924 (BD) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BE) vendor-specific 72 57 471597084 (C2) HDA temperature 28 43 34359738396 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 40 26 185137834 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -125919851153953 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2268874182 (F2) Unknown 100 253 144360056	53.1% Above average	Read 97.1 Write 87.9 Mixed 91.2 69% 92.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.46 101% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3 2x8GB 422 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 19.3 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 13.5 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-970A-UD3P Builds (Compare 817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P - $300

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	229x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	224x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	47x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	46x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	39x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	27x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	43x
BLS4G3D1609DS 2x4GBCrucialBench 43%, 4,102 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $645

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16