Lenovo 4157NL7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4157NL7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '16 at 17:14
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3550
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 81
2-Core 161
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 412
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
XFX(1682 4016) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Lighting 2.57
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 0.88
2% 2.89 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 4.09
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.46%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC65 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 103
Write 112
Mixed 13.2
55% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.09
42% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM 15h Reserved 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback