HP Compaq dc5750 Microtower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq dc5750 Microtower  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A64h
Memory2.3 GB free of 4.50098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111004
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '16 at 22:27
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+-$84
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 28
2-Core 50.3
34% 47.9 Pts
4-Core 48
8-Core 45.5
6% 46.8 Pts
64-Core 52
3% 52 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Nvidia(10DE 066D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.37% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 0.58
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.41 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.57
0% 0.64 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.37%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
0GB free
Firmware: JE3OA60B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 78.3
Write 72.1
Mixed 21.1
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.19
52% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 50%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 39.6
Mixed 22.3
25% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.31
75% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 33%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
0GB free
Firmware: 10.01E03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 33.4
Mixed 19.1
22% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.41
90% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 33%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Read 18
Write 10.1
Mixed 7.74
14% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.28
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
13% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 37GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 512, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc5750 Microtower Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc5750 Microtower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $35
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback