HP h8-1010pt

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP h8-1010pt  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB5
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111012
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 01 '17 at 22:49
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$197
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 176
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 390
43% 342 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
MSI(1462 2312) 3GB
CLim: 594 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 369.9
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 6.81
Parallax 4.75
5% 5.75 fps
MRender 7.71
Gravity 5.77
Splatting 8.26
6% 7.25 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP23 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 83.6
Write 94.6
Mixed 88.3
67% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.41
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-026.A00LF Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 9905458-026.A00LF Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback