Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion FL298AA-B14 a6626be (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON NARRA3
Memory	3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080620
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '17 at 13:05
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9550 2,773 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Memory 66 1-Core 32.3 2-Core 64.7 37% 54.3 Pts	4-Core 100 8-Core 113 14% 107 Pts	64-Core 117 7% 117 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT 27,834 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	2.11% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 4.35 Parallax 0.81 2% 2.52 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 3.17 2% 2.95 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.11% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 595GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 112 Write 108 Mixed 106 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.39 121% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 62%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 27GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	5.01% Terrible	Read 16.6 Write 7.13 Mixed 9.01 12% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.34 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.005 16% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.01% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 7 18% 6.33 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.3 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16