Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8710p (GC100EA#ACQ) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30C3
Memory	0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8
BIOS Date	20070903
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '17 at 09:45
Run Duration	509 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7300-$90 2,712 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Memory 62.9 1-Core 14.7 2-Core 38.8 29% 38.8 Pts	4-Core 41.9 8-Core 41.2 6% 41.6 Pts	64-Core 43.2 3% 43.2 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 320M 168 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 30C3) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.92 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.65 Parallax 0.12 1% 0.89 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.32 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNC128GBSJ 128GB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJTA0202 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5416 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 6895 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 34 (A9) Unknown 100 100 2383801877802 (AA) Unknown 100 100 292074291282 (AD) Unknown 193 193 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 631 (C2) HDA temperature 63 37 270583922725 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	28.6% Poor	Read 189 Write 182 Mixed 157 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 6.75 4K Write 13.8 4K Mixed 7.84 28% 9.47 MB/s	DQ Read 17.9 DQ Write 47 DQ Mixed 12.5 15% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 49%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB 7,781 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	2.45% Terrible	Read 11.3 Write 3.4 Mixed 2.01 5% 5.56 MB/s	4K Read 0.03 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 2% 0.02 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.45% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3 10% 3.53 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.4 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16