Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W280 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '17 at 15:06
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 75.1 1-Core 70.8 2-Core 118 54% 87.9 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 204 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 337 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 7 (64) Unknown 100 100 181120 (65) Unknown 100 100 65824 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 19 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 54 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 782 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 100 171800330273 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 319 (EA) Unknown 100 100 142 (F1) Unknown 100 100 279 (F2) Unknown 100 100 291 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	36.3% Below average	Read 254 Write 141 Mixed 89.6 35% 162 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 8.79 56% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 21.9 DQ Write 31.6 DQ Mixed 7.53 11% 20.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 567GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 173 4191 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1807 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 22975 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 145 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 102 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 178 178 68095 (C2) HDA temperature 107 99 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 2562448 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	49.2% Average	Read 88.5 Write 82.7 Mixed 87.3 65% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.25 89% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 84%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB 3,370 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 116GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 16.3 Mixed 21.3 27% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.93 4K Write 0.74 4K Mixed 0.72 60% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR1870EF48E8W1333 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 0443 RMR1870KF48E8F1333 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.5% Below average	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 12.1 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 8.5 23% 7.97 GB/s	Latency 90.1 44% 90.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W280 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	21x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	9x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	1x

GPU
FirePro 3800 (FireGL) Graphics AdapterATIBench 4%, 464 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	2x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBUnknownBench 37%, 202 samples	3x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	2x
CM3X2G1600C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 50%, 173 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $129

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16