| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160205 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 10 '17 at 16:15 |
| Run Duration | 88 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 38% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.9%
Average
|
52% 88.6 Pts
|
26% 199 Pts
|
13% 212 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti (448 Core LE)
MSI(1462 2574) 1.2GB
Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 306.97
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
20% 28.6 fps
|
18% 20.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Drevo X1 120G 120GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0510E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
81.7%
Excellent
|
95% 426 MB/s
|
104% 38.6 MB/s
|
49% 108 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.2%
Below average
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
25% 8.73 GB/s
|
32% 126 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 89 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ - $93
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples | 19x |
| Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 11x |
| A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 8x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 8x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 41% - Average | Total price: $375 |