Asus F2A55-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall percentile is the average of the percentiles for each component in the PC. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 980 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 7 years and 7 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus F2A55-M LE  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 16 '17 at 18:38
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD A8-5600K APU-$117
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.7% Above average
SC Int 80.9
SC Float 73.9
SC Mixed 75.3
61% 76.7 Pts
QC Int 253
QC Float 218
QC Mixed 247
54% 239 Pts
MC Int 250
MC Float 218
MC Mixed 249
36% 239 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti-$362
Palit(1569 1183) 2GB
MaxC: 1202 MHz, MaxM: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
43.7% Average
Lighting 98.1
Reflection 83.4
Parallax 112
30% 98 fps
MRender 84.3
Gravity 86.7
Splatting 62.7
57% 77.9 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 54%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 60GB-$47
2GB free
Firmware: S9FM02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port
29.1% Poor
Read 209
Write 35.4
Mixed 27.5
19% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 5.17
60% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 52.7
DQ Mixed 3.41
13% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$70
172GB free
Firmware: JPFOA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 57.8
Write 77.3
Mixed 28.1
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.39
87% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 8GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical F2A55-M LE Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $145
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X $399Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $87
Intel Core i7-7700K $310AMD RX 480 $177Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $121
Intel Pentium G4560 $99Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $235Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $164
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $110SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $115SanDisk Extreme 32GB $26
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $650SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback