Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120917
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateJan 21 '17 at 06:24
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 70
2-Core 135
61% 98 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 392
38% 315 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Gigabyte(1458 365D) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 365.19
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.03% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 11.6
8% 10.5 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 9.43
Splatting 13.2
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.03%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 487
Write 337
Mixed 375
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 18.6
82% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 69.5
95% 175 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 110%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
794GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 75.4
Write 104
Mixed 103
71% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.14
57% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 57%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
700GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 81.9
Write 68.9
Mixed 67.8
55% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.32
98% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 51%
WD WD7500AACS-00D6B0 750GB
343GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46% Average
Read 81.8
Write 78.2
Mixed 69.3
57% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.28
85% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49% Average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 17
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback