acer ICONIA Tab W501P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
Systemacer ICONIA Tab W501P  (all builds)
Motherboardacer WT1
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '17 at 10:54
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-60 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
23.9% Poor
Memory 44.1
1-Core 11.6
2-Core 24
20% 26.6 Pts
4-Core 24.3
8-Core 24.3
3% 24.3 Pts
64-Core 22.6
1% 22.6 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6290
Acer(1025 0577) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
0.76% Terrible
Lighting 0.83
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 1.03
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.09 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.76%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk P4 32GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SSD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.5% Very poor
Read 146
Write 59.7
Mixed 80.3
21% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.12
4K Write 3.41
4K Mixed 2.68
18% 4.74 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.37 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.8
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback