Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus H97-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '17 at 06:17
Run Duration	258 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4360-$77 1,789 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 94.8 1-Core 110 2-Core 206 80% 137 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 293 39% 293 Pts	64-Core 292 18% 292 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 118 Parallax 113 86% 112 fps	MRender 100 Gravity 100 Splatting 101 82% 100 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team L7 EVO SSD 240GB 581 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 188GB free Firmware: V2.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 176 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 31 (A1) Unknown 100 100 0 (A4) Unknown 100 100 606 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 63 (F2) Unknown 100 100 59 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0 (FB) Unknown 100 100 0 (FC) Unknown 100 100 0 (FD) Unknown 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	72.2% Very good	Read 499 Write 394 Mixed 342 91% 412 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 76 4K Mixed 3.27 86% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 76.4 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 3.87 32% 73 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 69%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5600 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1899 (B1) Unknown 97 97 103 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 61 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 20 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8758761897	90% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 330 Mixed 331 86% 391 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 20.5 136% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 36.9 80% 162 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 110%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 480GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 158 156 5066 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5074 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 30972 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4984 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 179 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5074 (C2) HDA temperature 117 84 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	54.5% Above average	Read 92.2 Write 97.6 Mixed 84.3 69% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 2.37 4K Mixed 0.45 114% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 65%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 234GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 158 155 5058 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9693 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 30893 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4986 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 180 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9693 (C2) HDA temperature 118 84 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 73743 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.5% Above average	Read 91.2 Write 91.5 Mixed 73.9 64% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.38 107% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 65%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 5 (03) Spinup time 187 183 5650 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9914 (05) Reallocated sector count 198 198 9 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 45 45 40862 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5464 (BE) vendor-specific 62 30 38 (C2) HDA temperature 112 80 38 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	20% Very poor	Read 33 Write 36.2 Mixed 35.6 26% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.36 89% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 35%
WD 5000BEV External 500GB 401 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 87GB free, PID null Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 40.4 Write 43.2 Mixed 40.9 54% 41.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.2 43% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 28,461 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	62.1% Good	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 20 60% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 19.9 55% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 57.7 69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,913 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	375x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	255x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	243x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	191x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	127x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	121x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	66x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	91x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	46x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $567

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16