Asus M4A78LT-M

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A78LT-M (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100824
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '17 at 13:31
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B45 1,025 User benchmarks, average bench 51% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 54.5 2-Core 109 55% 84.6 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 218 29% 217 Pts	64-Core 219 14% 219 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140 15,701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Zotac(19DA 1281) 2GB CLim: 1335 MHz, MLim: 1677 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 372.90 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Lighting 22.4 Reflection 20.9 Parallax 27.8 18% 23.7 fps	MRender 30.8 Gravity 26.5 Splatting 25.2 22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 114 88870049 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 14 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 32753420635493 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 292 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 290 (B1) Unknown 0 0 9 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 88870049 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 14 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 88870049 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 88870049 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 93 93 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 22060 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10683 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10683 (F2) Unknown 0 0 16185	32.4% Below average	Read 193 Write 55.2 Mixed 77.6 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 49.9 4K Mixed 9.5 68% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 57.6 DQ Mixed 9.28 16% 30.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 51%
Hitachi HTS 541010A9E680 1TB 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 141GB free Firmware: JA0OA710 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 194 100 73014444033 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 5806 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 6396 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 965 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 99 356482416641 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295098372 (BE) vendor-specific 70 51 421527582 (BF) G-sense error rate 99 99 365 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2293795 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 87 87 137105 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	45.9% Average	Read 83.5 Write 76.5 Mixed 69.1 57% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.17 60% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 59%
Seagate ST3200820A 200GB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 50GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 83 105287534 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5764 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 329110549 (09) Power-on hours count 50 50 44239 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 99 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1965 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 43 605945892 (C2) HDA temperature 36 57 77309411364 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 62 53 107820054 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 6 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	29.4% Poor	Read 48.2 Write 53.9 Mixed 13.5 28% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.24 68% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.4% Below average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 13.7 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 9.6 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A78LT-M Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A78LT-M

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	9x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	9x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	8x
HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples	6x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	17x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	9x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $203

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16