Asus P5KPL-AM SE

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	8.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5KPL-AM SE (all builds)
Memory	0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100820
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '17 at 01:58
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Memory 38.5 1-Core 10.4 2-Core 25.7 18% 24.9 Pts	4-Core 29.9 8-Core 33.8 4% 31.8 Pts	64-Core 15.9 1% 15.9 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% EVGA(3842 1559) 2GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	8.86% Terrible	Lighting 10.3 Reflection 12.6 Parallax 3.19 8% 8.69 fps	MRender 14.2 Gravity 7.03 Splatting 14 10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.86% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2557 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 322 (64) Unknown 100 100 1951552 (65) Unknown 100 100 351760 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 74 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 97 97 1161 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 703 (B7) Unknown 99 99 16 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 100 210454904866 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 4 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 4 (E7) Temperature 98 98 2 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3573 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1931 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2933 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4105 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 4	21.6% Poor	Read 176 Write 83.6 Mixed 61.8 23% 107 MB/s	4K Read 8.16 4K Write 16.2 4K Mixed 5.9 28% 10.1 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 22.1 DQ Mixed 7.53 10% 17.3 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 82%
WD WD800BB-88JHC0 80GB 2,880 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 22GB free Firmware: 06.01C06 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 164 163 2800 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5403 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16268 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3417 (C2) HDA temperature 97 72 46 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	27.7% Poor	Read 46.3 Write 50.3 Mixed 26.1 30% 40.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.32 70% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	6.17% Terrible	MC Read 1.9 MC Write 1.7 MC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.7 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 2.6 5% 1.9 GB/s	Latency 210 19% 210 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 6.17% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5KPL-AM SE Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM SE

CPU
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	34x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	31x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	30x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	41x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	34x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	315x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	37x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16