MSI P43 Neo-F (MS-7519)

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	7.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7519
Motherboard	MSI P43 Neo-F (MS-7519) (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100118
Uptime	20.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '17 at 19:16
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Memory 56.7 1-Core 41.9 2-Core 78.6 37% 59.1 Pts	4-Core 83 8-Core 80.3 11% 81.7 Pts	64-Core 55.8 4% 55.8 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250 11,945 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0585) 896MB Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	7.74% Terrible	Lighting 10.4 Reflection 9.04 Parallax 4.59 8% 8.02 fps	MRender 9.24 Gravity 7.57 Splatting 6.61 6% 7.8 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.74% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 420 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 591 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 13 (AE) Unknown 100 100 11 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2589 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 59 176094904353 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2750455289 (F7) Unknown 100 100 86176119 (F8) Unknown 100 100 43171578	43.3% Average	Read 210 Write 189 Mixed 145 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 14.2 71% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29.4 DQ Write 73.9 DQ Mixed 17.6 23% 40.3 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 113%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 336GB free Firmware: 1AA01112 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 86 86 5240 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 5633 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 9820 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 6190 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5076 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 55 420544537 (C2) HDA temperature 71 55 487653405 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 76764 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	36% Below average	Read 60.2 Write 64.6 Mixed 29.7 38% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.51 128% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5 14% 4.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.53 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P43 Neo-F (MS-7519) Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI P43 Neo-F (MS-7519)

CPU
Core2 Duo E7400Intel $130Bench 38%, 14,354 samples	6x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	4x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 4550ATIBench 1%, 3,005 samples	6x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	3x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	2x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 60GBKingston $76Bench 48%, 24,219 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	12x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	5x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16