Asus H97M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H97M-E (all builds)
Memory	16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160328
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '17 at 13:16
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 211 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 563 57% 462 Pts	64-Core 563 35% 563 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.62 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Lighting 22 Reflection 16.7 Parallax 19.5 18% 19.4 fps	MRender 23.8 Gravity 22.9 Splatting 16.1 17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
FSX-120GB 120GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.2.4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 41010775 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 -81836306853697 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1002 (AB) Unknown 0 0 1 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 89 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 0 0 1 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 41010775 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 41010775 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 41010775 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 5346 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6012 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6012 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5621	79.2% Very good	Read 491 Write 354 Mixed 431 95% 425 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 96.9 4K Mixed 15.8 122% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 30.2 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 14.1 27% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 103%
Toshiba MD03ACA200V 2TB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 741GB free Firmware: FL2V Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 6283 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 123 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 351 (0A) Spinup retry count 102 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 25 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 142 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 154619674655 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 95 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 492 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	82.8% Excellent	Read 146 Write 143 Mixed 139 107% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 2.94 4K Mixed 0.69 171% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 175GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 71 (03) Spinup time 124 124 12896960697 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 554 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2232 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 215 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 584 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 584 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 180389740575 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3	76.2% Very good	Read 134 Write 132 Mixed 146 104% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.2 78% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 107%
Toshiba MD04ABA400V 4TB 316 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 65GB free Firmware: FP1T Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5182 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 158 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 386 (0A) Spinup retry count 103 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 49 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 170 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 158914576410 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 105 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 717 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	47.6% Average	Read 82.5 Write 83.2 Mixed 78.3 61% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.2 74% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 92%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 931GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 107 Write 103 Mixed 71.8 118% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.21 62% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1600KLH-8G 0714 U3A8G93-16GBHE3B00 1315 CT51264BD160BJ.C8F 20GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.6% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 8.5 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 10.1 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	584x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	388x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	305x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	199x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	192x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	159x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	64x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	107x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	63x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $277

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16