Asrock X79 Extreme4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive12.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme4-M  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131105
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '17 at 19:37
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 174
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 525
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 841A) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
29.6% Poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 41.6
28% 36.3 fps
MRender 45.5
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 32.8
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.8% Very poor
Read 245
Write 38.5
Mixed 58.8
24% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 0.59
4K Mixed 0.43
2% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MK7559GSXP 750GB-$118
674GB free
Firmware: 1C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49% Average
Read 74.6
Write 95.9
Mixed 79.7
63% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.18
70% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
459GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 95.6
Write 81.7
Mixed 80.2
64% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.41
89% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
229GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 129
Write 113
Mixed 103
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.18
64% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 113%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
13GB free
Firmware: VM100-41 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 42.1
Write 44.2
Mixed 40.5
32% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.29
76% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 32%
TOSHIBA MK7559GSXP 750GB
576GB free, PID 7788
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
Read 94.4
Write 87.6
Mixed 83.8
113% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.25
65% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
65.7% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 23.6
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme4-M Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback