| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5E3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20091022 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 12 '17 at 18:27 |
| Run Duration | 97 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.1%
Average
|
45% 66.9 Pts
|
10% 77.6 Pts
|
5% 81.8 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
MSI(1462 2875) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 355.82
|
18.4%
Very poor
|
18% 22.2 fps
|
20% 23.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
35% 158 MB/s
|
54% 16.6 MB/s
|
32% 64.8 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 4096, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22%
Poor
|
19% 6.8 GB/s
|
18% 6.37 GB/s
|
49% 81.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5E3 Builds (Compare 34 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5E3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 7x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Duo E6850Intel $57Bench 40%, 4,150 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 4x |
| GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 3x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 41% - Average | Total price: $273 |