Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '17 at 12:19
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 76.2 2-Core 149 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 456 46% 373 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% EVGA(3842 3967) CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	39% Below average	Lighting 51.4 Reflection 47.4 Parallax 46.4 42% 48.4 fps	MRender 39.6 Gravity 43.5 Splatting 39 33% 40.7 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149 16,872 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -46969762347931 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 356 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 143 (B7) Unknown 100 100 15 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 30 48 68722622494 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 143 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 10 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 268464 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 56 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 268464 (F2) Unknown 100 100 357291 (F9) Unknown 100 100 10324	50.5% Above average	Read 485 Write 222 Mixed 254 70% 320 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 10.2 30% 9.45 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 48.7 73% 136 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 91%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 223 176 5833 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 180 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 354 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 128 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 113 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1237 (C2) HDA temperature 121 105 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 181 32 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	88.2% Excellent	Read 180 Write 127 Mixed 124 108% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.24 104% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 865GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 227 179 5650 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 81 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 135 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 81 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 70 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 670 (C2) HDA temperature 122 107 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	96% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 150 Mixed 142 119% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.28 112% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 101%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$32 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 12GB free Firmware: 4.AA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4490 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 128093238 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 10071 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4151 (BB) vendor-specific 95 95 5 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 49 555679777 (C2) HDA temperature 33 51 68719476769 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 93 70 68270534 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	22.9% Poor	Read 46 Write 33.5 Mixed 38.3 30% 39.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.37 89% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 738 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	48.5% Average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 17.1 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 12 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD5 Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 - $192

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	143x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	28x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	24x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	25x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	28x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $490

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16