Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 7 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI GENE  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '17 at 19:47
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-4690K-$235
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
SC Int 120
SC Float 119
SC Mixed 120
96% 120 Pts
QC Int 406
QC Float 460
QC Mixed 413
96% 426 Pts
MC Int 473
MC Float 467
MC Mixed 476
71% 472 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750 Ti-$107
Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB
MaxC: 1293 MHz, MaxM: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 372.70
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 60.9
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 59.9
18% 54 fps
MRender 48.4
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 35.9
24% 49.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 24%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$138
184GB free
Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 353
Mixed 418
95% 426 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 38.5
160% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 125
145% 250 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST31000340NS 1TB-$55
399GB free
Firmware: SN06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 93.4
Write 88.2
Mixed 85
67% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.39
97% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 59%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$60
151GB free
Firmware: 82.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 91.4
Write 77.3
Mixed 70.8
60% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.24
82% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 88%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$60
27GB free
Firmware: 82.0
4KALIGNED
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 86.6
Mixed 93.6
69% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.16
55% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 8
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42%
Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS VI GENE Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE - $184

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,183
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $310Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $94
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $330AMD RX 480 $195Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $235Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $177
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $110SanDisk Extreme 64GB $34
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $430SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $9
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback