Asus N56JN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus N56JN (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N56JN
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140512
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '17 at 13:05
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	73%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370 42,062 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 132 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 401 38% 316 Pts	64-Core 395 24% 395 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 14AD) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3383 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.7% Terrible	Lighting 5.13 Reflection 6.88 Parallax 6.94 4% 6.32 fps	MRender 10.1 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 8.13 6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.7% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 1 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4409 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3586 (B1) Unknown 93 93 76 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 1 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 51 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 530 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20279955377
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 466GB free Firmware: GG2OA6C0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 60129542145 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1540 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 735 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 860 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 63 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 13652 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 171799543839 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	57.8% Above average	Read 94.5 Write 107 Mixed 16 52% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.18 64% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 58%
WD My Passport 0830 1TB 8,379 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 657GB free, PID 0830 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 27.5 Mixed 27.3 36% 29 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.25 76% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G3N169ES4.16FE 2x4GB 476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 18.3 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 70.7 56% 70.7 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N56JN Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N56JN

CPU
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	110x
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	105x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	18x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	159x
GeForce 840MNvidiaBench 9%, 20,978 samples	74x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	50x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	46x
ASU16D3LS1KFG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 553 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16