Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

Motherboard	Parallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory	1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	4608 x 2592 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170118
Uptime	12.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '17 at 15:09
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Memory 53.6 1-Core 77.1 2-Core 76.3 44% 69 Pts	4-Core 77.9 8-Core 78.3 10% 78.1 Pts	64-Core 77.7 5% 77.7 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM) 2,233 User benchmarks, average bench 26% ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 1,004MB Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 12.1.41532.0 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	21.8% Poor	Lighting 26.5 Reflection 22.7 Parallax 24.7 22% 24.6 fps	MRender 17.4 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 29.5 22% 26.6 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 47%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HDD [0] 69GB 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: FWR10003 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 667, 667 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 5.1 14% 4.97 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4 13% 4.5 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,039x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16