Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '17 at 05:39
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 241
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 767
77% 624 Pts
64-Core 954
59% 954 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.57
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.7
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
106GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 514
Write 411
Mixed 414
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 25.2
140% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 40.3
DQ Write 90.4
DQ Mixed 121
76% 84 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 134%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
73GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 508
Write 170
Mixed 289
71% 323 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 11.7
76% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 51.9
DQ Mixed 11.3
16% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 76%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 521
Write 476
Mixed 491
111% 496 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 21.6
124% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 21
29% 51.2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 116%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
172GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 116
Write 77.1
Mixed 75.2
67% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.36
99% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 40.7
123% 43 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 23.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 56.4
71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback