Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '17 at 14:27
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 48%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 84.2
1-Core 48.8
2-Core 82.9
48% 72 Pts
4-Core 98.9
8-Core 134
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.7% Average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 54.4
Parallax 56.8
51% 58 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 53.2
Splatting 54.1
47% 57.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM01D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48% Average
Read 310
Write 98.8
Mixed 150
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 16.5
92% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 26.1
DQ Write 80.5
DQ Mixed 18.7
24% 41.8 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 48%
Great: 107%
Toshiba MK1059GSM 1TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: GL002C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 72.5
Write 68.5
Mixed 23.8
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.19
58% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 49%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80
20GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 65.4
Mixed 35.1
40% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.33
91% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $152
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback