Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite Pro A200 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA ISKAA
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080828
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '17 at 21:16
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5450-$89 1,321 User benchmarks, average bench 31% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.94% Terrible	Memory 17.4 1-Core 8.2 2-Core 15.8 10% 13.8 Pts	4-Core 15.3 8-Core 16 2% 15.6 Pts	64-Core 15.9 1% 15.9 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 9.94% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 634 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FF00) 128MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	0.62% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.41 1% 0.75 fps	MRender 0.86 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 1.17 1% 0.75 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.62% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 406 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 667 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 10 (AE) Unknown 100 100 17 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4066 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 59 55 193273528361 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 3320181776 (F7) Unknown 100 100 104397213 (F8) Unknown 100 100 67478954	34.8% Below average	Read 242 Write 198 Mixed 202 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 10.2 36% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 43.6 DQ Write 37.2 DQ Mixed 18.7 20% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.87% Terrible	MC Read 1.8 MC Write 1.4 MC Mixed 1.4 4% 1.53 GB/s	SC Read 0.8 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 1 3% 1.13 GB/s	Latency 341 12% 341 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 4.87% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Dual T2330Intel $90Bench 29%, 867 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 2600ATIBench 1%, 487 samples	1x

SSD
Premier Pro SP900 128GBAdata $40Bench 69%, 2,820 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $130

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16