| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5KC (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20080625 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 01 '17 at 19:57 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 41% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
39.1%
Below average
|
35% 53 Pts
|
13% 104 Pts
|
7% 110 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 250X
Gigabyte(1458 2282) 2GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
15% 19.2 fps
|
14% 16.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
31.6%
Below average
|
38% 172 MB/s
|
44% 14.8 MB/s
|
11% 16.7 MB/s
|
|
|
74.4%
Very good
|
90% 121 MB/s
|
90% 1.04 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
17% 5.93 GB/s
|
13% 4.4 GB/s
|
33% 122 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5KC Builds (Compare 260 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5KC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 42x |
| Xeon X5460Intel $190Bench 52%, 10,360 samples | 23x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 20x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 12x |
| GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 8x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $129 |