Performance Results


Gaming 140% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 151% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 96.2 1-Core 94.4 2-Core 243 81% 144 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 1,036 88% 757 Pts	64-Core 1,760 109% 1,760 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	149% Outstanding	Lighting 221 Reflection 208 Parallax 193 180% 207 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 186 Splatting 134 123% 152 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 931GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 33 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 67 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12748047	107% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 406 Mixed 418 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 94.4 4K Mixed 50.3 179% 62.5 MB/s	DQ Read 45.7 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 25.5 58% 112 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 860GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	279% Outstanding	Read 2,140 Write 1,706 Mixed 1,875 425% 1,907 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 166 4K Mixed 57.9 232% 89.9 MB/s	DQ Read 466 DQ Write 374 DQ Mixed 200 210% 347 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 279% Great: 363%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 1,108 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	155% Outstanding	MC Read 64 MC Write 64 MC Mixed 59.4 178% 62.5 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 19.7 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 53.3 75% 53.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 138%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 114%

UFO

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	24x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	8x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,280Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	6x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples	6x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	5x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	5x

RAM
Dominator DDR4 2400 C14 8x8GBCorsairBench 124%, 153 samples	8x
M391A1K43BB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 34 samples	4x
16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 2x16GBMicronBench 73%, 274 samples	4x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,154

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16