Asus Rampage III Extreme

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Rampage III Extreme (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111003
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '17 at 06:42
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 000 102 User benchmarks, average bench 79% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 94.6 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 171 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 540 54% 441 Pts	64-Core 672 42% 672 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088 6,806 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Nvidia(10DE 1035) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.2% Average	Lighting 49 Reflection 49.8 Parallax 55.6 40% 51.5 fps	MRender 68.4 Gravity 59.3 Splatting 47.7 47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ RevoDrive 3 PCIe 240GB-$600 224 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 13166542 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 -120619861537474 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2532 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 610 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 13166542 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 13166542 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 13166542 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15828 (EA) Unknown 0 0 14533 (F1) Unknown 0 0 14533 (F2) Unknown 0 0 23242	53.1% Above average	Read 335 Write 174 Mixed 173 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 14.5 77% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 62.3 DQ Mixed 10.4 42% 98.3 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 81%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 191GB free Firmware: 03.03V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 201 200 2916 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9000 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7709 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6004 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 79 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9000 (C2) HDA temperature 121 101 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	59.7% Above average	Read 108 Write 100 Mixed 99.5 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.48 4K Mixed 0.51 130% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 68%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90 11,249 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 88GB free Firmware: 04.04V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 196 195 3175 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8263 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7785 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6103 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 91 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8263 (C2) HDA temperature 120 101 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55.5% Above average	Read 100 Write 92.8 Mixed 86 70% 93 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 2.72 4K Mixed 0.55 142% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 69%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 1TB 1,714 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 190GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 106 Write 144 Mixed 90.3 149% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 2.91 4K Mixed 0.33 112% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	49.6% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 17.8 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 11.7 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 58.3 69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Rampage III Extreme Builds (Compare 742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 77%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 65%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Extreme

CPU
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples	146x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	128x
Core i7 X 990Intel $499Bench 78%, 4,994 samples	94x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	39x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	22x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	21x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	20x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	172x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	86x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	80x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $628

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16