Asus P5K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5K  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '17 at 11:14
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Xeon E5450-$160
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
40.6% Average
SC Int 72.7
SC Float 43.3
SC Mixed 54.3
46% 56.8 Pts
QC Int 293
QC Float 169
QC Mixed 213
51% 225 Pts
MC Int 288
MC Float 167
MC Mixed 217
34% 224 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Gigabyte(1458 3510) 1.2GB
CLim: 845 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Lighting 86.4
Reflection 114
Parallax 103
29% 101 fps
MRender 85.4
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 68.4
31% 74.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 30%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$57
244GB free
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P5K Builds (Compare 1,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P5K - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $401
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $367Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $390Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $118
Intel Core i5-7600K $220Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $718SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $57HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $139SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback