HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 SE

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 84% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 SE (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2271
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150730
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '17 at 10:35
Run Duration	551 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	71%
CPU Throttled	84%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y51 484 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	43.4% Average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 36.1 2-Core 60 38% 55.3 Pts	4-Core 100 8-Core 108 14% 104 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 2271) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4279 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 2.38 2% 2.26 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 3.48 2% 2.61 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN3Q-256G-1006 256GB 251 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 222GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2180006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 252 252 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 252 252 6 (0C) Power cycle count 252 252 57 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 393216 (AE) Unknown 252 252 34 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 25 (BE) vendor-specific 49 31 51 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	65.3% Good	Read 360 Write 334 Mixed 339 77% 345 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 54.1 4K Mixed 18.1 86% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 92.1 DQ Mixed 50.8 53% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 97%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 9GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	2.99% Terrible	Read 13.2 Write 2.96 Mixed 3.38 6% 6.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.84 4K Write 0.002 4K Mixed 0.003 7% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.99% Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 0GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 38.1 Write 7.43 Mixed 9.24 17% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.53 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.91 87% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 746448-381 2x4GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.6% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 11.9 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 6.2 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 SE

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)