Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140806
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '17 at 20:47
Run Duration	343 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470S 14,631 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 93.2 2-Core 179 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 356 46% 349 Pts	64-Core 341 21% 341 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2600-XT 1,081 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B E420) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.46% Terrible	Lighting 2.87 Reflection 5.54 Parallax 1.34 2% 3.25 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 4.87 3% 3.11 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.46% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 60GB 2,582 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 48017735276507 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1911 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1910 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 68578 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 68578 (F2) Unknown 100 100 89857 (F9) Unknown 100 100 4412	39.1% Below average	Read 385 Write 63.9 Mixed 109 40% 186 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 14.6 4K Mixed 9.53 64% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 48.5 DQ Write 20.3 DQ Mixed 14.2 16% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 67%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 150GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 133 126 6308 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1985 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29734 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1845 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 153 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 808190 (C2) HDA temperature 113 95 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.4% Below average	Read 62.6 Write 60.6 Mixed 65.5 48% 62.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.17 62% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7 16,591 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 7GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.43% Terrible	Read 25 Write 4.48 Mixed 6.46 11% 12 MB/s	4K Read 3.51 4K Write 0.002 4K Mixed 0.003 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.43% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	60.4% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 18.8 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 18 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	387x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	205x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	131x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	64x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $906

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16