CX H81M1

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	CX H81M1 (all builds)
Motherboard	CX CX H81-M1
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141107
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '17 at 04:18
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 183 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 361 48% 358 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.5% Average	Lighting 60.6 Reflection 56.8 Parallax 52.4 49% 56.6 fps	MRender 72.6 Gravity 55.7 Splatting 56.3 50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76 9,139 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 6625 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1453 (A5) Unknown 100 100 833350338228 (A6) Unknown 100 100 8 (A7) Unknown 100 100 49 (A8) Unknown 100 100 61 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 30 (AE) Unknown 100 100 151 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 49 63 270584578099 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 6622940235270 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3388 (EA) Unknown 100 100 8976 (F1) Unknown 253 253 5944 (F2) Unknown 253 253 7702 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	79.3% Very good	Read 447 Write 315 Mixed 244 74% 335 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 69.7 4K Mixed 19.6 112% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 48.1 80% 156 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 98GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 173 2300 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2491 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6971 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1470 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 165 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2475 (C2) HDA temperature 100 89 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	69.5% Good	Read 130 Write 113 Mixed 106 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.27 99% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 109%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 27GB free Firmware: JF100-19 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 4416 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4835 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11138 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2516 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 114971710 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 61 61 40 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 130 121 654442532 (C2) HDA temperature 127 118 671219749 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 114971710 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	38.3% Below average	Read 64.8 Write 68.4 Mixed 54.4 47% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.32 75% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35 38,490 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 18.5 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.7 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M1 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: CX H81M1

CPU
Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples	2x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	1x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	1x
GeForce GT 740NvidiaBench 7%, 30,433 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,879 samples	1x
ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 52%, 4,966 samples	1x
KHX1866C10D3/4G 0721 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 7 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $172

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

CX H81M1

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: CX H81M1

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)