| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140604 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 09 '17 at 05:50 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 84% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
39.4%
Below average
|
40% 63.4 Pts
|
18% 143 Pts
|
10% 159 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 290X-$549
PowerColor(148C 2342) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.4%
Below average
|
39% 49.8 fps
|
40% 48.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
58.8%
Above average
|
85% 382 MB/s
|
55% 18.2 MB/s
|
27% 60.7 MB/s
|
|
|
48.1%
Average
|
68% 89.1 MB/s
|
56% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
|
23.7%
Poor
|
24% 8.4 GB/s
|
16% 5.63 GB/s
|
28% 140 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 48x |
| FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 27x |
| FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 5x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $657 |