PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-MA785GMT-UD2H (all builds) |
Memory | 10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100713 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 09 '17 at 20:56 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
29.3%
Poor
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
40.6%
Average
|
|||
41.3%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
|
20.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 15x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 14x |
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples | 11x |
R9 380AMD $200Bench 33%, 83,027 samples | 6x |
Radeon R5 220AMDBench 1%, 1,709 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $175 |