Asus P9X79 LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 LE  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 12 '17 at 16:02
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 390
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
EVGA(3842 2881) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 373.6
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 61.5
Reflection 57.8
Parallax 76.3
50% 65.2 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 43.8
47% 59.5 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 496
Write 345
Mixed 226
78% 356 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 21
103% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 68.9
82% 145 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 118%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
3GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 101
Write 86.9
Mixed 75.4
66% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.23
73% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54%
Great: 83%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
454GB free, PID 231b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 93.2
Write 91.8
Mixed 41.7
92% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 0.84
4K Mixed 0.17
35% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 42%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
59GB free, PID 2320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 74.2
Write 84.6
Mixed 41.9
84% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.25
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 42%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
46GB free, PID 0100
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 24.1
Write 22.8
Mixed 9.26
22% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.18
58% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 44%
WD My Passport 0740 320GB
1GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 23.6
Write 21.4
Mixed 17.2
26% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.17
47% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 LE Builds (Compare 1,135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 LE - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $429
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback