Clevo P170EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemClevo P170EM  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO P170EM
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '14 at 01:25
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 119
42% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 191
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 42% Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Clevo(1558 7102) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3621
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 3.37
Reflection 3.67
Parallax 2.91
3% 3.32 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8.04
5% 5.39 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Volume0 240GB
127GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 97%
Crucial M4 128GB mSATA-$229
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 07MH Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.3% Average
Read 269
Write 182
Mixed 217
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 5.79
66% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 7.46
34% 77.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
784GB free, PID 0100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 93.4
129% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.2
67% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 44%
Typical P170EM Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo P170EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $638
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback